4.2 Article

Treating acute myeloid leukemia in older adults

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2014.1.14

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Clinical Investigator Team Leadership Award awarded by the National Cancer Institute [P30CA016056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease of older adults, with a median age of 67 years at presentation. In the past, only a third of older patients (defined as individuals older than 60-65 years of age) with AML received definitive therapy for their disease due to concerns about their overall fitness and potential treatment-related mortality. However, compelling epidemiological data have shown unequivocally that older AML patients up to 80 years old both tolerate and survive longer after therapy than their untreated counterparts. Current therapeutic options for elderly individuals with AML include intensive chemotherapy with a cytarabine and anthracycline backbone, hypomethylating agents (decitabine and azacitidine), low-dose cytarabine, investigational agents, and supportive care with hydroxyurea and transfusions. Over the last few years, there has been increasing debate regarding the appropriate therapeutic approach to take in older adults given the diversity of the geriatric patient population and heterogeneous AML disease biology. This article discusses how performance status, comorbidities, disease characteristics, quality of life concerns, and long-term treatment goals affect the selection of appropriate therapy for older adults with AML. Risks and benefits of each treatment approach based on the most recent medical literature are discussed. Finally, a treatment algorithm summarizing these data and incorporating geriatric assessment and molecular and cytogenetic markers predictive of therapeutic response is proposed to aid in the clinical decision-making process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available