4.4 Article

Specific nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins can promote the location of chromosomes to and from the nuclear periphery

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-2-r14

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Edinburgh Staff Scholarship
  2. Higher Education Funding Council (Wales)
  3. ERC [ERC-2009-AdG-20090506]
  4. Medical Research Council, UK
  5. Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship [076616, 095209]
  6. Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology [077707]
  7. MRC [MC_PC_U127527202] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_U127527202] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Different cell types have distinctive patterns of chromosome positioning in the nucleus. Although ectopic affinity-tethering of specific loci can be used to relocate chromosomes to the nuclear periphery, endogenous nuclear envelope proteins that control such a mechanism in mammalian cells have yet to be widely identified. Results: To search for such proteins, 23 nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins were screened for their ability to promote peripheral localization of human chromosomes in HT1080 fibroblasts. Five of these proteins had strong effects on chromosome 5, but individual proteins affected different subsets of chromosomes. The repositioning effects were reversible and the proteins with effects all exhibited highly tissue-restricted patterns of expression. Depletion of two nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins that were preferentially expressed in liver each reduced the normal peripheral positioning of chromosome 5 in liver cells. Conclusions: The discovery of nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins that can modulate chromosome position and have restricted patterns of expression may enable dissection of the functional relevance of tissue-specific patterns of radial chromosome positioning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available