4.4 Article

Genome-wide identification and characterization of replication origins by deep sequencing

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-4-r27

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Cancer Society Research Scholar Grant
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24114516] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: DNA replication initiates at distinct origins in eukaryotic genomes, but the genomic features that define these sites are not well understood. Results: We have taken a combined experimental and bioinformatic approach to identify and characterize origins of replication in three distantly related fission yeasts: Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Schizosaccharomyces octosporus and Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Using single-molecule deep sequencing to construct amplification-free high-resolution replication profiles, we located origins and identified sequence motifs that predict origin function. We then mapped nucleosome occupancy by deep sequencing of mononucleosomal DNA from the corresponding species, finding that origins tend to occupy nucleosome-depleted regions. Conclusions: The sequences that specify origins are evolutionarily plastic, with low complexity nucleosome-excluding sequences functioning in S. pombe and S. octosporus, and binding sites for trans-acting nucleosome-excluding proteins functioning in S. japonicus. Furthermore, chromosome-scale variation in replication timing is conserved independently of origin location and via a mechanism distinct from known heterochromatic effects on origin function. These results are consistent with a model in which origins are simply the nucleosome-depleted regions of the genome with the highest affinity for the origin recognition complex. This approach provides a general strategy for understanding the mechanisms that define DNA replication origins in eukaryotes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available