4.7 Article

Cytological techniques to analyze meiosis in Arabidopsis arenosa for investigating adaptation to polyploidy

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00546

Keywords

Arabidopsis arenosa; polyploidy; cytology; immunolocalization; meiosis; recombination; synaptonemal complex

Categories

Funding

  1. BBSRC
  2. NIH [1F32GM105293-01]
  3. Harvard Postdoctoral Award for Professional Development
  4. BBSRC [BB/K007505/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K007505/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arabidopsis arenosa is a close relative of the model plant A. thaliana, and exists in nature as stable diploid and autotetraploid populations. Natural tetraploids have adapted to whole genome duplication and do not commonly show meiotic errors such as multivalent and univalent formation, which can lead to chromosome non-disjunction and reduced fertility. A genome scan for genes strongly differentiated between diploid and autotetraploid A. arenosa identified a subset of meiotic genes that may be responsible for adaptation to polyploid meiosis. To investigate the mechanisms by which A. arenosa adapted to its polyploid state, and the functionality of the identified potentially adaptive polymorphisms, a thorough cytological analysis is required. Therefore, in this chapter we describe methods and techniques to analyze male meiosis in A. arenosa, including optimum plant growth conditions, and immunocytological and cytological approaches developed with the specific purpose of understanding meiotic adaptation in an autotetraploid. In addition we present a meiotic cytological atlas to be used as a reference for particular stages and discuss observations arising from a comparison of meiosis between diploid and autotetraploid A. arenosa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available