4.7 Article

Mathematical modeling of an oscillating gene circuit to unravel the circadian clock network of Arabidopsis thaliana

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00003

Keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; circadian clock; mathematical modeling; light signal transduction; temperature acclimation; hormone signal integration; metabolic signal integration; stress signal integration

Categories

Funding

  1. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DA1061/4-1, DA1061/5-1, DA1061/6-1, DA1061/7-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock is an interconnected network highly tractable to systems approaches. Most elements in the transcriptional translational oscillator were identified by genetic means and the expression of clock genes in various mutants led to the founding hypothesis of a positive negative feedback loop being the core clock. The identification of additional clock genes beyond those defined in the core led to the use of systems approaches to decipher this angiosperm oscillator circuit. Kinetic modeling was first used to explain periodicity effects of various circadian mutants. This conformed in a flexible way to experimental details. Such observations allowed a recursive use of hypothesis generating from modeling, followed by experimental corroboration. More recently, the biochemical finding of new description of a DNA-binding activity for one class of clock components directed improvements in feature generation, one of which revealed that the core of the oscillator is a negative negative feedback loop. The recursive use of modeling and experimental validation has thus revealed many essential transcriptional components that drive negative arms in the circadian oscillator. What awaits is to more fully describe the positive arms and an understanding of how additional pathways converge on the clock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available