4.7 Article

Reconsidering the nature and mode of action of metabolite retrograde signals from the chloroplast

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00300

Keywords

retrograde signaling; metabolite; drought; high light; gene regulation; 3 '-phosphoadenosine 5 '-phosphate; methylerythritol cyclodiphosphate; beta-cyclocitral

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy of Biology [CE0561495]
  2. ARC Linkage Grant [LP110200257]
  3. Australian Commonwealth International Postgraduate Research Scholarship
  4. Australian National University
  5. Australian Research Council [LP110200257] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant organelles produce retrograde signals to alter nuclear gene expression in order to coordinate their biogenesis, maintain homeostasis, or optimize their performance under adverse conditions. Many signals of different chemical nature have been described in the past decades, including chlorophyll intermediates, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and adenosine derivatives. While the effects of retrograde signaling on gene expression are well understood, the initiation and transport of the signals and their mode of action have either not been resolved, or are a matter of speculation. Moreover, retrograde signaling should be considered as part of a broader cellular network, instead of as separate pathways, required to adjust to changing physiologically relevant conditions. Here we summarize current plastid retrograde signaling models in plants, with a focus on new signaling pathways, SALl-PAP, methylerythritol cyclodiphosphate (MEcPP), and beta-cyclocitral (beta-CC), and outline missing links or future areas of research that we believe need to be addressed to have a better understanding of plant intracellular signaling networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available