4.2 Article

Velocity-selective adaptation of the horizontal and cross-axis vestibulo-ocular reflex in the mouse

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 232, Issue 10, Pages 3035-3046

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3988-8

Keywords

VOR; Visual-vestibular training; Vestibular adaptation; Oculomotor learning; Plasticity; Afferent pathways

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Biomedical Career Development Award [568736]
  2. NHMRC Project [APP1010896]
  3. University of New South Wales (UNSW) International Research Scholarship
  4. Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA) supplementary scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One commonly observed phenomenon of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation is a frequency-selective change in gain (eye velocity/head velocity) and phase (relative timing between the vestibular stimulus and response) based on the frequency content of the adaptation training stimulus. The neural mechanism behind this type of adaptation is not clear. Our aim was to determine whether there were other parameter-selective effects on VOR adaptation, specifically velocity-selective and acceleration-selective changes in the horizontal VOR gain and phase. We also wanted to determine whether parameter selectivity was also in place for cross-axis adaptation training (a visual-vestibular training stimulus that elicits a vestibular-evoked torsional eye movement during horizontal head rotations). We measured VOR gain and phase in 17 C57BL/6 mice during baseline (no adaptation training) and after gain-increase, gain-decrease and cross-axis adaptation training using a sinusoidal visual-vestibular (mismatch) stimulus with whole-body rotations (vestibular stimulus) with peak velocity 20 and 50A degrees/s both with a fixed frequency of 0.5 Hz. Our results show pronounced velocity selectivity of VOR adaptation. The difference in horizontal VOR gain after gain-increase versus gain-decrease adaptation was maximal when the sinusoidal testing stimulus matched the adaptation training stimulus peak velocity. We also observed similar velocity selectivity after cross-axis adaptation training. Our data suggest that frequency selectivity could be a manifestation of both velocity and acceleration selectivity because when one of these is absent, e.g. acceleration selectivity in the mouse, frequency selectivity is also reduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available