4.2 Article

Consistent interindividual increases or decreases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity during experimental muscle pain

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 232, Issue 4, Pages 1309-1315

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3847-7

Keywords

Pain; Muscle sympathetic nerve activity; Nociceptive pain; Chronic pain

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently showed that long-lasting muscle pain, induced by intramuscular infusion of hypertonic saline, evoked two patterns of cardiovascular responses across subjects: one group showed parallel increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), blood pressure, and heart rate, while the other group showed parallel decreases. Given that MSNA is consistent day to day, we tested the hypothesis that individuals who show increases in MSNA during experimental muscle pain will show consistent responses over time. MSNA was recorded from the peroneal nerve, together with blood pressure and heart rate, during an intramuscular infusion of hypertonic saline causing pain for an hour in 15 subjects on two occasions, 2-27 weeks apart. Pain intensity ratings were not significantly different between the first (5.8 +/- A 0.4/10) and second (6.1 +/- A 0.2) recording sessions. While four subjects showed significant decreases in the first session (46.6 +/- A 9.2 % of baseline) and significant increases in the second (159.6 +/- A 8.9 %), in 11 subjects, there was consistency in the changes in MSNA over time: either a sustained decrease (55.6 +/- A 6.8 %, n = 6) or a sustained increase (143.5 +/- A 6.1 %, n = 5) occurred in both recording sessions. There were no differences in pain ratings between sessions for any subjects. We conclude that the changes in MSNA during long-lasting muscle pain are consistent over time in the majority of individuals, reflecting the importance of studying interindividual differences in physiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available