4.2 Article

Transfer of learning between hands to handle a novel object in old age

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 227, Issue 1, Pages 9-18

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3451-2

Keywords

Age; Intermanual; Learning; Precision grip; Force

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transferring information about object weight between hands for use in scaling prehension forces likely depends on the integrity of the structures linking the two sides of the brain. It is unknown whether healthy older adults, who demonstrate a modest decline in this connectivity, transfer fingertip force scaling for object weight between hands. In the present study, healthy older and young adults performed two tasks: gripping and lifting an object, and a ballistic finger abduction movement. For the grip and lift task, participants practiced lifting a novel object using a precision pinch grip with the right hand (RH) and then did so again with the left hand (LH). For the ballistic task, participants were trained to maximally accelerate the right index finger by abducting it. On the grip and lift task, all participants appeared to overestimate the object weight during the 1st RH lift, followed by a progressive reduction on successive lifts. This adaptation was transferred to the LH in both groups on their first lift and remained stable over subsequent lifts. In contrast, the training-induced peak abduction acceleration on the ballistic task transferred poorly to the LH in older with considerably better transfer in young adults. We conclude that the memory representations scaling the lift force for the grip and lift task generalized to the untrained hand, while the greater acceleration that was acquired during practice of the ballistic task showed an incomplete transfer to the opposite hand. These differences may indicate task-dependent interhemispheric transfer of learning in old age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available