4.2 Article

Ipsilesional trajectory control is related to contralesional arm paralysis after left hemisphere damage

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 196, Issue 2, Pages 195-204

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1836-z

Keywords

Paresis, lateralization; Motor control; Stroke; Ipsilateral impairment; Hemisphere; Motor cortex, premotor cortex, motor performance; Hemiparesis; Hemisphere, arm paralysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Merit Review and Rehabilitation Merit Review [B4476]
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. National Institute for Child Health and Human Development [RO1HD39311]
  4. National Institute on Aging
  5. Interdisciplinary Training in Gerontology [T32AG00048]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have recently shown ipsilateral dynamic deficits in trajectory control are present in left hemisphere damaged (LHD) patients with paresis, as evidenced by impaired modulation of torque amplitude as response amplitude increases. The purpose of the current study is to determine if these ipsilateral deficits are more common with contralateral hemiparesis and greater damage to the motor system, as evidenced by structural imaging. Three groups of right-handed subjects (healthy controls, LHD stroke patients with and without upper extremity paresis) performed single-joint elbow movements of varying amplitudes with their left arm in the left hemispace. Only the paretic group demonstrated dynamic deficits characterized by decreased modulation of peak torque (reflected by peak acceleration changes) as response amplitude increased. These results could not be attributed to lesion volume or peak velocity as neither variable differed across the groups. However, the paretic group had damage to a larger number of areas within the motor system than the non-paretic group suggesting that such damage increases the probability of ipsilesional deficits in dynamic control for modulating torque amplitude after left hemisphere damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available