4.2 Review

A computational neuroanatomy for motor control

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 185, Issue 3, Pages 359-381

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1280-5

Keywords

optimal control; computational models; reaching; cerebellum; basal ganglia; motor cortex; parietal cortex

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS057814, R01NS037422] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM007057] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS037422-09A2, R01 NS037422, R01 NS057814-03, R01 NS057814] Funding Source: Medline
  4. PHS HHS [K02-048099, R01-052804, R01-037422] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of patients to infer normal brain function has a long tradition in neurology and psychology. More recently, the motor system has been subject to quantitative and computational characterization. The purpose of this review is to argue that the lesion approach and theoretical motor control can mutually inform each other. Specifically, one may identify distinct motor control processes from computational models and map them onto specific deficits in patients. Here we review some of the impairments in motor control, motor learning and higher-order motor control in patients with lesions of the corticospinal tract, the cerebellum, parietal cortex, the basal ganglia, and the medial temporal lobe. We attempt to explain some of these impairments in terms of computational ideas such as state estimation, optimization, prediction, cost, and reward. We suggest that a function of the cerebellum is system identification: to build internal models that predict sensory outcome of motor commands and correct motor commands through internal feedback. A function of the parietal cortex is state estimation: to integrate the predicted proprioceptive and visual outcomes with sensory feedback to form a belief about how the commands affected the states of the body and the environment. A function of basal ganglia is related to optimal control: learning costs and rewards associated with sensory states and estimating the cost-to-go during execution of a motor task. Finally, functions of the primary and the premotor cortices are related to implementing the optimal control policy by transforming beliefs about proprioceptive and visual states, respectively, into motor commands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available