4.8 Article

Optogenetic dissection of mitotic spindle positioning in vivo

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38198

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek NWO TOP/ECHO grant [711.015.001]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIH R01 GM083071, NIH K99 GM115964]
  3. Helen Hay Whitney Foundation
  4. European Research Council Synergy grant [609822]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R00GM115964, R01GM083071] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH [P40OD010440] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The position of the mitotic spindle determines the plane of cell cleavage, and thereby daughter cell location, size, and content. Spindle positioning is driven by dynein-mediated pulling forces exerted on astral microtubules, which requires an evolutionarily conserved complex of G alpha center dot GDP, GPR-1/2(Pins/LGN), and LIN-5(Mud/NuMA) proteins. To examine individual functions of the complex components, we developed a genetic strategy for light-controlled localization of endogenous proteins in C. elegans embryos. By replacing G alpha and GPR-1/2 with a light-inducible membrane anchor, we demonstrate that G alpha center dot GDP, G alpha center dot GTP, and GPR-1/2 are not required for pulling-force generation. In the absence of G a and GPR-1/2, cortical recruitment of LIN-5, but not dynein itself, induced high pulling forces. The light-controlled localization of LIN-5 overruled normal cell-cycle and polarity regulation and provided experimental control over the spindle and cellcleavage plane. Our results define G alpha center dot GDP-GPR-1/2 (Pins/LGN) as a regulatable membrane anchor, and LIN-5(Mud/NuMA) as a potent activator of dynein-dependent spindle-positioning forces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available