4.8 Article

Autophagy is a critical regulator of memory CD8+ T cell formation

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.03706

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, Oxford
  2. Wellcome Trust [088098/Z/08/Z]
  3. Allan and Nesta Ferguson Charitable Trust
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. Lady Tata Memorial Trust
  6. Wellcome Trust [088098/Z/08/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  7. BBSRC [BB/G021422/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [MC_UU_12010/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G021422/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Cancer Research UK [11331] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12010/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Wellcome Trust [103830/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During infection, CD8(+) T cells initially expand then contract, leaving a small memory pool providing long lasting immunity. While it has been described that CD8(+) T cell memory formation becomes defective in old age, the cellular mechanism is largely unknown. Autophagy is a major cellular lysosomal degradation pathway of bulk material, and levels are known to fall with age. In this study, we describe a novel role for autophagy in CD8(+) T cell memory formation. Mice lacking the autophagy gene Atg7 in T cells failed to establish CD8(+) T cell memory to influenza and MCMV infection. Interestingly, autophagy levels were diminished in CD8(+) T cells from aged mice. We could rejuvenate CD8(+) T cell responses in elderly mice in an autophagy dependent manner using the compound spermidine. This study reveals a cell intrinsic explanation for poor CD8(+) T cell memory in the elderly and potentially offers novel immune modulators to improve aged immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available