4.8 Article

The quantitative architecture of centromeric chromatin

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.02137

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Molecular Biology Organization EMBO Installation grant
  2. European Commission
  3. European Research Council [ERC-2013-CoG-615638]
  4. National Institutes of Health [GM082989, GM077238]
  5. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  6. Rita Allen Foundation
  7. Beckman Laser Institute and Foundation
  8. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (Foundation for Science and Technology) [SFRH/BD/74284/2010, BIA-BCM/100557/2008, BIA-PRO/100537/2008]
  9. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/74284/2010, PTDC/BIA-BCM/100557/2008, PTDC/BIA-PRO/100537/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The centromere, responsible for chromosome segregation during mitosis, is epigenetically defined by CENP-A containing chromatin. The amount of centromeric CENP-A has direct implications for both the architecture and epigenetic inheritance of centromeres. Using complementary strategies, we determined that typical human centromeres contain similar to 400 molecules of CENP-A, which is controlled by a mass-action mechanism. This number, despite representing only similar to 4% of all centromeric nucleosomes, forms a similar to 50-fold enrichment to the overall genome. In addition, although pre-assembled CENP-A is randomly segregated during cell division, this amount of CENP-A is sufficient to prevent stochastic loss of centromere function and identity. Finally, we produced a statistical map of CENP-A occupancy at a human neocentromere and identified nucleosome positions that feature CENP-A in a majority of cells. In summary, we present a quantitative view of the centromere that provides a mechanistic framework for both robust epigenetic inheritance of centromeres and the paucity of neocentromere formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available