3.9 Article

Roles of Size, Position, and Speed of Stimulus in Vection with Stimuli Projected on a Ground Surface

Journal

AEROSPACE MEDICINE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE
Volume 86, Issue 9, Pages 794-802

Publisher

AEROSPACE MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.3357/AMHP.4206.2015

Keywords

self-motion; body sway; optic flow properties

Funding

  1. Program to Disseminate the Tenure Tracking System, MEXT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

INTRODUCTION: Although the induction of vection (perception of illusory self-motion) has been studied for some decades, the effect of ground surface properties on vection remains to be assessed quantitatively. This study will be helpful for designing helicopter or airplane flight simulation, because pilots often perceive optic flow on the ground surface and perceive self-motion from such flows. METHOD: Vection stimuli of variable position, size, and optic flow speed were presented in a trapezoidal area on a ground surface. Body sway was also measured. RESULTS: Substantial vection was induced by stimuli on a ground surface. Increases in stimulus speed and size were each associated with stronger vection (e.g., the subjective strength increased by 50% as the speed increased from 0.375 m.s(-1) to 1.5 m.s(-1)). When the stimulus occupied a more distant section of the visual field, vection was more efficiently induced than when the nearer section was occupied (e.g., the subjective strength decreased by 50% when the nearer half section of optical flow was removed). These properties of vection were similar to vection induced by upright vertical stimuli. Speed, size, and position of vection stimuli modified both length and direction of body sway significantly. Vection and body sway showed some correlations (e.g., r = 0.55). CONCLUSION: Stimuli on ground surfaces can induce substantial vection and vection strength can be modified by the stimulus properties of the ground surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available