4.8 Article

Crystal structures of the CPAP/STIL complex reveal its role in centriole assembly and human microcephaly

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.01071

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1201/3, G0900888]
  2. Cancer Research UK [10530]
  3. Wellcome Trust [083599/Z/07/Z]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01-GM074207]
  5. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [984451] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_U105192716, MC_UP_1201/3] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. MRC [MC_U105192716, MC_UP_1201/3] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Wellcome Trust [083599/Z/07/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Centrioles organise centrosomes and template cilia and flagella. Several centriole and centrosome proteins have been linked to microcephaly (MCPH), a neuro-developmental disease associated with small brain size. CPAP (MCPH6) and STIL (MCPH7) are required for centriole assembly, but it is unclear how mutations in them lead to microcephaly. We show that the TCP domain of CPAP constitutes a novel proline recognition domain that forms a 1:1 complex with a short, highly conserved target motif in STIL. Crystal structures of this complex reveal an unusual, all-beta structure adopted by the TCP domain and explain how a microcephaly mutation in CPAP compromises complex formation. Through point mutations, we demonstrate that complex formation is essential for centriole duplication in vivo. Our studies provide the first structural insight into how the malfunction of centriole proteins results in human disease and also reveal that the CPAP-STIL interaction constitutes a conserved key step in centriole biogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available