4.8 Article

Injectable Hydrogels for Cardiac Tissue Repair after Myocardial Infarction

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 2, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201500122

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. URB (University Research Board)
  2. American University of Beirut (AUB)
  3. Faculty of Medicine
  4. AUB
  5. CNRS (National Council for Scientific Research) grant, Lebanon
  6. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P20GM103638]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiac tissue damage due to myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. The available treatments of MI include pharmaceutical therapy, medical device implants, and organ transplants, all of which have severe limitations including high invasiveness, scarcity of donor organs, thrombosis or stenosis of devices, immune rejection, and prolonged hospitalization time. Injectable hydrogels have emerged as a promising solution for in situ cardiac tissue repair in infarcted hearts after MI. In this review, an overview of various natural and synthetic hydrogels for potential application as injectable hydrogels in cardiac tissue repair and regeneration is presented. The review starts with brief discussions about the pathology of MI, its current clinical treatments and their limitations, and the emergence of injectable hydrogels as a potential solution for post MI cardiac regeneration. It then summarizes various hydrogels, their compositions, structures and properties for potential application in post MI cardiac repair, and recent advancements in the application of injectable hydrogels in treatment of MI. Finally, the current challenges associated with the clinical application of injectable hydrogels to MI and their potential solutions are discussed to help guide the future research on injectable hydrogels for translational therapeutic applications in regeneration of cardiac tissue after MI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available