4.0 Article

Inversion twinning in a second polymorph of the hydrochloride salt of the recreational drug ethylone

Journal

Publisher

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S2053229615004295

Keywords

polymorphism; computational chemistry; twinning; ethylone; pharmaceutical compound; amphetamine analogue; crystal structure; hydrochloride salt; hydrogen bonding; DFT calculations; lattice energy calculations; absolute structure refinement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A second polymorph of the hydrochloride salt of the recreational drug ethylone, C12H16NO3+center dot Cl-, is reported [systematic name: (+/-)-2-ethylammonio-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)propane-1-one chloride]. This polymorph, denoted form (A), appears in crystallizations performed above 308 K. The originally reported form (B) [Wood et al. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 32-38] crystallizes preferentially at room temperature. The conformations of the cations in the two forms differ by a 180 degrees rotation about the C-C bond linking the side chain to the aromatic ring. Hydrogen bonding links the cations and anions in both forms into similar extended chains in which any one chain contains only a single enantiomer of the chiral cation, but the packing of the ions is different. In form (A), the aromatic rings of adjacent chains interleave, but pack equally well if neighbouring chains contain the same or opposite enantiomorph of the cation. The consequence of this is then near perfect inversion twinning in the structure. In form (B), neighbouring chains are always inverted, leading to a centrosymmetric space group. The question as to why the polymorphs crystallize at slightly different temperatures has been examined by density functional theory (DFT) and lattice energy calculations and a consideration of packing compactness. The free energy (Delta G) of the crystal lattice for polymorph (A) lies some 52 kJ mol(-1) above that of polymorph (B).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available