Journal
BMC GERIATRICS
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-31
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0407-10147]
- British Geriatrics Society
- National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0407-10147] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
- National Institute for Health Research [RP-PG-0407-10147] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: A thorough understanding of the literature generated from research in care homes is required to support evidence-based commissioning and delivery of healthcare. So far this research has not been compiled or described. We set out to describe the extent of the evidence base derived from randomized controlled trials conducted in care homes. Methods: A systematic mapping review was conducted of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in care homes. Medline was searched for Nursing Home, Residential Facilities and Homes for the Aged; CINAHL for nursing homes, residential facilities and skilled nursing facilities; AMED for Nursing homes, Long term care, Residential facilities and Randomized controlled trial; and BNI for Nursing Homes, Residential Care and Long-term care. Articles were classified against a keywording strategy describing: year and country of publication; randomization, stratification and blinding methodology; target of intervention; intervention and control treatments; number of subjects and/or clusters; outcome measures; and results. Results: 3226 abstracts were identified and 291 articles reviewed in full. Most were recent (median age 6 years) and from the United States. A wide range of targets and interventions were identified. Studies were mostly functional (44 behaviour, 20 prescribing and 20 malnutrition studies) rather than disease-based. Over a quarter focussed on mental health. Conclusions: This study is the first to collate data from all RCTs conducted in care homes and represents an important resource for those providing and commissioning healthcare for this sector. The evidence-base is rapidly developing. Several areas - influenza, falls, mobility, fractures, osteoporosis - are appropriate for systematic review. For other topics, researchers need to focus on outcome measures that can be compared and collated.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available