4.5 Article

Estimation of Emissions from Sugarcane Field Burning in Thailand Using Bottom-Up Country-Specific Activity Data

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 669-685

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos5030669

Keywords

sugarcane; open burning; biomass burning; residue to product ratio; biomass load; sugarcane biomass fuel; combustion factor; combustion efficiency; emission inventory

Funding

  1. Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment-Center for Energy Technology and Environment, King Mongut's University of Technology Thonburi
  2. Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Thailand, under the National Research University (NRU) grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Open burning in sugarcane fields is recognized as a major source of air pollution. However, the assessment of its emission intensity in many regions of the world still lacks information, especially regarding country-specific activity data including biomass fuel load and combustion factor. A site survey was conducted covering 13 sugarcane plantations subject to different farm management practices and climatic conditions. The results showed that pre-harvest and post-harvest burnings are the two main practices followed in Thailand. In 2012, the total production of sugarcane biomass fuel, i. e., dead, dry and fresh leaves, amounted to 10.15 million tonnes, which is equivalent to a fuel density of 0.79 kg.m(-2). The average combustion factor for the pre-harvest and post-harvest burning systems was determined to be 0.64 and 0.83, respectively. Emissions from sugarcane field burning were estimated using the bottom-up country-specific values from the site survey of this study and the results compared with those obtained using default values from the 2006 IPCC Guidelines. The comparison showed that the use of default values lead to underestimating the overall emissions by up to 30% as emissions from post-harvest burning are not accounted for, but it is the second most common practice followed in Thailand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available