Journal
APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 268-272Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e3181cddde9
Keywords
breast cancer; estrogen receptor; progesterone receptor; immunohistochemistry; oncotypeDX; H-score
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Estrogen receptor (ER) status is a strong predictor of response to hormonal therapy in women with breast cancer. Not only presence of ER, but also level of expression has been shown to correlate with time to recurrence in patients undergoing therapy with tamoxifen or anastrozole. In addition, risk reduction occurs in ER-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-positive patients treated with hormonal therapy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been the method of choice for determining hormone receptor status. Recently, Genomic Health began reporting ER and PR status measured quantitatively by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a component of its Oncotype DX assay. As part of our quality assurance program, we reviewed 80 breast cancer cases that had been evaluated by the Oncotype DX assay and also underwent immunohistochemical staining for ER and PR. We found excellent correlation between ER and PR status determined qualitatively by each method. In addition, when hormone receptor expression measured quantitatively by RT-PCR and semiquantitatively by IHC were compared, results showed linear correlation. Given the additional advantages of hormone receptor IHC performed on intact tissue sections, currently there is no definitive reason to switch to RT-PCR for determination of ER and PR expressions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available