4.1 Article

Confirmatory double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety of edaravone (MCI-186) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/21678421.2014.959024

Keywords

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS-R; edaravone; placebo; randomized trial

Funding

  1. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp.
  2. Naito Science Foundation and serves as an advisory board member of Brain, an editorial board member of Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
  3. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp, and serves on the scientific advisory board for the Kanae Science Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science
  4. Journal of Neurology
  5. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
  6. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  7. Ministry of Welfare, Health and Labor of Japan
  8. Japan Science and Technology Agency, Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
  9. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp
  10. NCNP
  11. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  12. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our objective was to confirm the efficacy and safety of edaravone in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. We conducted a 36-week confirmatory study, consisting of 12-week pre-observation period followed by 24-week treatment period. Patients received placebo or edaravone i.v. infusion over 60 min for the first 14 days in cycle 1, and for 10 of the first 14 days during cycles 2 to 6. The efficacy primary endpoint was changed in the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) scores during the 24-week treatment. Patients were treated with placebo (n = 104) and edaravone (n = 102). Changes in ALSFRS-R during the 24-week treatment were -6.35 +/- 0.84 in the placebo group (n = 99) and -5.70 +/- 0.85 in the edaravone group (n = 100), with a difference of 0.65 +/- 0.78 (p = 0.411). Adverse events amounted to 88.5% (92/104) in the placebo group and 89.2% (91/102) in the edaravone group. In conclusion, the reduction of ALSFRS-R was smaller in the edaravone group than in the placebo group, but efficacy of edaravone for treatment of ALS was not demonstrated. Levels and frequencies of reported adverse events were similar in the two groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available