Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 101-107Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2011.600396
Keywords
alcohol; cue exposure; cue exposure training; cue reactivity; D-cycloserine; problem drinkers
Categories
Funding
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH078308] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM [R21AA017696, K23AA016936] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA024315, R01DA011716] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: It has been shown that the partial N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) agonist D-cycloserine (DCS) facilitates exposure-based learning in humans with anxiety disorders. However, the effects of DCS on exposure to substance cues are still uncertain. Objective: The primary aim of the study was to examine the effects of DCS on exposure sessions to alcohol cues. Methods: Twenty non-treatment-seeking problem drinkers were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg of DCS or placebo 50 minutes prior to each of 3 alcohol cue exposure sessions consisting of 5 exposure trials within an 8-day period. Following this, participants underwent two test sessions without the administration of any medication. The test sessions occurred 3 and 7 days after the last cue exposure session, respectively. Dependent measures included drinking urge and heart rate and drinking urge during the test sessions. Results: Individuals who received DCS showed increased craving to alcohol cues as compared with individuals who received placebo during the first test session. No group difference in drinking urge was found during the second test session. Furthermore, the groups did not differ in heart rate at any of the assessment points. Conclusions: The results suggest that DCS may temporarily augment cue-elicited craving for alcohol. Scientific Significance: As in an earlier study with cocaine-dependent individuals, DCS appears to exhibit a different profile in problem drinkers to those with anxiety disorders. Dose, timing, arousal, and treatment motivation as considerations are discussed, as are methodological considerations and the need for additional studies in this area.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available