4.2 Article

Evaluation of Vegetable Production on Extensive Green Roofs

Journal

AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 465-484

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21683565.2012.756847

Keywords

green roofs; urban agriculture; rooftop farming; vegetables

Funding

  1. Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI
  2. ChristenDETROIT Roofing Contractors, Detroit, MI
  3. XeroFlor America, Durham, NC
  4. Renewed Earth, Kalamazoo, MI
  5. MSU AgBioResearch
  6. Michigan State University Horticultural Teaching and Research Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rooftop vegetable gardening is a production system in urban agriculture based on green roof technology. To broaden the scope of this practice, the use of relatively shallow substrate depths must be explored, since most existing flat roofs are unable to support much added weight. Three growing systemsa green roof, raised green roof platforms, and in-groundwere evaluated for vegetable and herb production over three growing seasons (2009-2011). Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum), green beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), cucumbers (Cucumis sativus), peppers (Capsicum annuum), basil (Ocimum basilicum), and chives (Allium schoenoprasum) were studied because of their common use in home gardens. All plants, except pepper, survived and produced biomass in all growing systems and yielded crops large enough for analysis in 2009 and 2010. Overall, yields and basil biomass were higher and of better quality in-ground during 2009, the only year irrigation was applied, and similar on the roof and platforms. Variability in success was partially due to annual weather variation with the greatest impact on cucumber. Yields of chive, a perennial crop, were not affected by growing system after the first year. Results suggest that, with proper management, vegetable and herb production in an extensive green roof system is possible and productive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available