4.1 Article

Physio-mechanical and aggregate properties of limestones from Pakistan

Journal

ACTA GEODAETICA ET GEOPHYSICA
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 369-380

Publisher

AKADEMIAI KIADO RT
DOI: 10.1007/s40328-014-0054-8

Keywords

Limestone aggregate petrography; Aggregate impact value; Margala Hill Limestone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physical characterization study was carried out on limestones from Samana Suk Formation, Shekhai Formation, Kawagarh Formation, Margala Hill Limestone and Lockhart Limestone to explore their potential for utilization as aggregate sources. Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with BS and ASTM standards to determine specific gravity, water absorption, total and effective porosities, Flakiness Index, Elongation Index, LosAngeles Abrasion value and Aggregate Impact values of these limestones. The evaluated physical properties were compared with standard specifications for their qualification as construction material. Mutual relationships between physical parameters have been described by simple regression analysis. Significant direct correlation of water absorption with Los Angeles abrasion value was noted. Direct relationship of total porosity with Aggregate Impact Value and Los Angeles abrasion value was also revealed. However, negative trends of Aggregate Impact Value with Flakiness Index and Los Angeles abrasion value with Elongation Index were observed. Petrographic study reveals that micrite and bioclasts contents vary directly while dolomite has an inverse relation with Los Angeles Abrasion values. However, calcite contents do not seem to affect mechanical properties of these limestones. The study indicates that the limestones of Samana Suk Formation, Kawagarh Formation, Lockhart Limestone and Shakhai Formation fall within the standard specification limits and can be utilized as aggregate sources for indigenous construction industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available