4.6 Article

Rational Design of High-Performance Continuous-Flow Microreactors Based on Gold Nanoclusters and Graphene for Catalysis

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 15425-15433

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03858

Keywords

Gold nanoclusters; Reduced graphene oxide; Catalytic membrane microreactor; 4-Nitrophenol

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFF0215703, 2016YFC0400501]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [18PJ1400400]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, China [18ZR1401000]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes (Tianjin Polytechnic University) [M2-201709]
  5. Donghua University [113-07-005710]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we rationally designed a high-performance microreactor system for continuous-flow catalysis. The membrane consists of ultrasmall gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) and two-dimensional graphene. The Au cores of the NCs act as catalysts, while their ligands have two functions: (1) protecting the Au cores to avoid agglomeration and (2) providing a well-defined surfactant assembly to disperse graphene in aqueous solution. Hydrogenation of 4-nitro-phenol (4-NP) was employed as model reaction to evaluate catalytic activity. The catalytic membrane microreactor demonstrated excellent catalytic activity and stability, where complete 4-NP conversion was readily achieved via a single pass through the membrane. This desirable performance was maintained over 12 h of continuous operation, although a certain amount of organic buildup on the membrane was observed. The catalytic membrane microreactor outperforms conventional batch reactors due to its improved mass transport. 4-NP-spiked real water samples were also completely converted. This study provides new insights for the rational design of membrane reactors for industrial applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available