4.6 Article

Comparison of Nonprecious Metal Cathode Materials for Methane Production by Electromethanogenesis

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 910-917

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sc400520x

Keywords

Biocathode; Carbon capturing and sequestration; Microbial electrolysis cell; Power-to-gas; Microbially influenced corrosion; Carbon black; Graphite; Polyaciylonitrile

Funding

  1. Global Climate and Energy Program (GCEP)
  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-I1-003-13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In methanogenic microbial electrolysis cells (MMCs), CO2 is reduced to methane using a methanogenic biofilm on the cathode by either direct electron transfer or evolved hydrogen. To optimize methane generation, we examined several cathode materials: plain graphite blocks, graphite blocks coated with carbon black or carbon black containing metals (platinum, stainless steel or nickel) or insoluble minerals (ferrihydrite, magnetite, iron sulfide, or molybdenum disulfide), and carbon fiber brushes. Assuming a stoichiometric ratio of hydrogen (abiotic):methane (biotic) of 4:1, methane production with platinum could be explained solely by hydrogen production. For most other materials, however, abiotic hydrogen production rates were insufficient to explain methane production. At -600 mV, platinum on carbon black had the highest abiotic hydrogen gas formation rate (1600 +/- 200 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)) and the highest biotic methane production rate (250 +/- 90 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)). At -550 mV, plain graphite (76 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)) performed similarly to platinum (73 nmol cm(-3) d(-1)). Coulombic recoveries, based on the measured current and evolved gas, were initially greater than 100% for all materials except platinum, suggesting that cathodic corrosion also contributed to electromethanogenic gas production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available