4.6 Article

Reactivity and Regio-Selectivity of Renewable Building Blocks for the Synthesis of Water-Dispersible Polyurethane Prepolymers

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 788-797

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sc400459q

Keywords

Isosorbide; Ethyl ester lysine diisocyanate; Kinetic study; Polyurethanes; Polyurethane dispersions

Funding

  1. Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI) [658]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To prepare water-borne polyurethane dispersions (PUD) from novel, renewable-based, asymmetric, bifunctional building blocks, it is important to understand the reactivity and regio-selectivity differences between the various functional groups and reagents, respectively. This paper first describes the mutual reactivity and regio-selectivity of biomass-derived asymmetric 1,4:3,6-dianhydro-D-glucitol (isosorbide, IS) and ethyl ester L-lysine diisocyanate (EELDI) in polyurethane (PU) syntheses. The regioselectivities of the endo- and exo-OH functional groups of IS and the primary epsilon-NCO and secondary alpha-NCO of EELDI were found to have only minor consequences for the formation of NCO-terminated PU prepolymers. In addition, a model study of IS, dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA), EELDI, and a dimer fatty acid-based diisocyanate (DDI) in their respective PU reactions revealed the reaction rate differences between these four compounds. Surprisingly, a comparatively low reaction rate of DMPA was observed. For the PU prepolymers synthesized from the four mentioned components, an enrichment in DMPA near the polymer chain ends may thus be expected. Finally, PU dispersions prepared from these four-component prepolymers showed a good storage stability. The relatively small particle size at a low DMPA content and a high EELDI and IS content is predominantly regarded as the result of the hydrophilicity of EELDI, IS, and possibly the enhanced DMPA concentration near the chain ends of the PU prepolymer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available