4.6 Article

A New Stochastic Kriging Method for Modeling Multi-Source Exposure-Response Data in Toxicology Studies

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages 1581-1591

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/sc500102h

Keywords

Exposure-response; Multi-source data; Stochastic kriging; Gaussian process; Nanotoxicoiogy

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1065931]
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [1RC2E5018742-01]
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1065931] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1065931] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the most fundamental steps in risk assessment is to quantify the exposure-response relationship for the material/chemical of interest. This work develops a new statistical method, referred to as SKQ (stochastic kriging with qualitative factors), to synergistically model exposure-response data, which often arise from multiple sources (e.g., laboratories, animal providers, and shapes of nanomaterials) in toxicology studies. Compared to the existing methods, SKQ has several distinct features. First, SKQ integrates data across multiple sources and allows for the derivation of more accurate information from limited data. Second, SKQ is highly flexible and able to model practically any continuous response surfaces (e.g., dose-time-response surface). Third, SKQ is able to accommodate variance heterogeneity across experimental conditions and to provide valid statistical inference (i.e., quantify uncertainties of the model estimates). Through empirical studies, we have demonstrated SKQ's ability to efficiently model exposure-response surfaces by pooling information across multiple data sources. SKQ fits into the mosaic of efficient decision-making methods for assessing the risk of a tremendously large variety of nanomaterials and helps to alleviate safety concerns regarding the enormous amount of new nanomaterials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available