4.5 Review

The multifaceted roles of RNA binding in APOBEC cytidine deaminase functions

Journal

WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-RNA
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 493-508

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1226

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK [DK43739]
  2. NIAID [AI54369, AI095007, AI58789]
  3. NINDS [NS067671]
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [F49620]
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Grand Challenges in Exploration grant
  6. Public Health Services [NIAID AI076085]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytidine deaminases have important roles in the regulation of nucleoside/deoxynucleoside pools for DNA and RNA synthesis. The APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases (named after the first member of the family that was described, Apolipoprotein B mRNA Editing Catalytic Subunit 1, also known as APOBEC1 or A1) is a fascinating group of mutagenic proteins that use RNA and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) as substrates for their cytidine or deoxycytidine deaminase activities. APOBEC proteins and base-modification nucleic acid editing have been the subject of numerous publications, reviews, and speculation. These proteins play diverse roles in host cell defense, protecting cells from invading genetic material, enabling the acquired immune response to antigens and changing protein expression at the level of the genetic code in mRNA or DNA. The amazing power these proteins have for interphase cell functions relies on structural and biochemical properties that are beginning to be understood. At the same time, the substrate selectivity of each member in the family and their regulation remains to be elucidated. This review of the APOBEC family will focus on an open question in regulation, namely what role the interactions of these proteins with RNA have in editing substrate recognition or allosteric regulation of DNA mutagenic and host-defense activities. (C) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available