4.1 Article

Unrealized Potential: A Review of Perceptions and Use of Weather and Climate Information in Agricultural Decision Making

Journal

WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 47-61

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00062.1

Keywords

Australia; North America; Climate variability; Agriculture; Communications; decision making; Societal impacts

Funding

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2011-68002-30220]
  2. Purdue Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews research on agricultural decision makers' use and perceptions of weather and climate information and decision support tools (DSTs) conducted in the United States, Australia, and Canada over the past 30 years. Forty-seven relevant articles, with locations as diverse as Australian rangelands and the southeastern United States, ranging in focus from corn to cattle, were identified. NVivo 9 software was used to code research methods, type of climate information explored, barriers to broader use of weather information, common themes, and conclusions from each article. Themes in this literature include the role of trusted agricultural advisors in the use of weather information, farmers' management of weather risks, and potential agricultural adaptations that could increase resilience to weather and climate variability. While use of weather and climate information and DSTs for agriculture has increased in developed countries, these resources are still underutilized. Reasons for low use and reduced usefulness highlighted in this literature are perceptions of low forecast accuracy; forecasts presented out of context, reducing farmers' ability to apply them; short forecast lead times; inflexible management and operations that limit the adaptability of a farm; and greater concern with nonweather risks (such as regulation or market fluctuation). The authors' main recommendation from reviewing this literature is that interdisciplinary and participatory processes involving farmers and advisors have the potential to improve use of weather and climate DSTs. The authors highlight important gaps revealed by this review, and suggest ways to improve future research on these topics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available