4.6 Article

Comparison of Three Systems for Biological Greywater Treatment

Journal

WATER
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 155-169

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w2020155

Keywords

aerobic treatment; anaerobic treatment; greywater; surfactants; sludge yield

Funding

  1. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
  2. European Union Regional Development Fund
  3. Province of Fryslan
  4. City of Leeuwarden
  5. EZ/Kompas program of the 'Samenwerkingsverband Noord-Nederland'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Greywater consists of household wastewater excluding toilet discharges. Three systems were compared for the biological treatment of greywater at a similar hydraulic retention time of approximately 12-13 hours. These systems were aerobic treatment in a sequencing batch reactor, anaerobic treatment in an up-flow anaerobic blanket reactor and combined anaerobic-aerobic treatment (up-flow anaerobic blanket reactor + sequencing batch reactor). Aerobic conditions resulted in a COD removal of 90%, which was significantly higher than 51% removal by anaerobic treatment. The low removal in the anaerobic reactor may have been caused by high concentration of anionic surfactants in the influent (43.5 mg/L) and a poor removal of the colloidal fraction of the COD in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Combined aerobic-anaerobic treatment accomplished a COD removal of 89%, similar to the aerobic treatment alone. Greywater methanization was 32% for the anaerobic system and 25% for the anaerobic-aerobic system, yielding a small amount of energy. Therefore, anaerobic pre-treatment is not feasible and an aerobic system is preferred for the treatment of greywater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available