4.6 Article

Intracisternal Administration of Tissue Plasminogen Activator Improves Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow and Cortical Perfusion After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Mice

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL STROKE RESEARCH
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 227-237

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12975-014-0329-y

Keywords

Early brain injury; Global ischemia; Intracranial pressure; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Tissue plasminogen activator; Cerebral blood flow

Funding

  1. NHLBI [F30 HL108624, R01 HL093140]
  2. Oregon Brain Institute
  3. NINDS [R01 NS044313, NS070837]
  4. NIBIB [R01 EB009682]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early brain injury (EBI) during the first 72 h after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is an important determinant of clinical outcome. A hallmark of EBI, global cerebral ischemia, occurs within seconds of SAH and is thought to be related to increased intracranial pressure (ICP). We tested the hypothesis that ICP elevation and cortical hypoperfusion are the result of physical blockade of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow pathways by cisternal microthrombi. In mice subjected to SAH, we measured cortical blood volume (CBV) using optical imaging, ICP using pressure transducers, and patency of CSF flow pathways using intracisternally injected tracer dye. We then assessed the effects of intracisternal injection of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). ICP rose immediately after SAH and remained elevated for 24 h. This was accompanied by a decrease in CBV and impaired dye movement. Intracisternal administration of tPA immediately after SAH lowered ICP, increased CBV, and partially restored CSF flow at 24 h after SAH. Lowering ICP without tPA, by draining CSF, improved CBV at 1 h, but not 24 h after SAH. These findings suggest that blockade of CSF flow by microthrombi contributes to the early decline in cortical perfusion in an ICP-dependent and ICP-independent manner and that intracisternal tPA may reduce EBI and improve outcome after SAH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available