4.7 Article

Characterization of Chicken-Derived Single Chain Antibody Fragments against Venom of Naja Naja Atra

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins10100383

Keywords

Naja naja atra (NNA); venom proteins; IgY antibodies; phage display technology; single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 105-2622-8-038-001-TB1]
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare [DOH99-DC-1013, MOHW 106-TDU-B-212-144001, MOHW 107-TDU-B-212-114014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional, horse-derived antivenin is currently the most efficient treatment against snake bites. However, it is costly and has unpredictable side effects. Thus, alternative, cost-effective strategies for producing antivenin are needed. In this study, we immunized hens with inactivated NNA venom proteins from the cobra Naja naja atra (NNA). Purified yolk IgY antibodies showed specific anti-NNA binding activity comparable to that of the equine-derived antivenin. We used phage display technology to generate two antibody libraries containing 9.0 x 10(8) and 8.4 x 10(8) clones with a short or long linker, respectively. The phage ELISA indicated that anti-NNA clones displaying single-chain variable fragments (scFv) were significantly enriched after biopanning. The nucleotide sequences of the light and heavy chain genes of 30 monoclonal scFv antibodies were determined and classified into six groups with the short linker and nine groups with the long linker. These scFv clones specifically bound to NNA proteins but not to venom proteins from other snakes. Their binding affinities were further determined by competitive ELISA. Animal model studies showed that anti-NNA IgY antibodies exhibited complete protective effects, while a combination of scFv antibodies raised the survival rates and times of mice challenged with lethal doses of NNA venom proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available