4.6 Article

Intravenous Infusion of Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Phase la Clinical Trial

Journal

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 636-642

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.18-0031

Keywords

Clinical trial; Mesenchymal stem cell; Rheumatoid arthritis; Safety; Umbilical cord blood

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on immunomodulatory actions of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs), in vitro or preclinical studies of hUCB-MSCs have been conducted extensively in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, few human trials have investigated the outcomes of hUCB-MSC infusions. The CURE-iv trial was a phase I, uncontrolled, open label trial for RA patients with moderate disease activity despite treatment with methotrexate. The patients received a single intravenous infusion of 2.5 x 10(7), 5 x 10(7), or 1 x 10(8) cells of hUCB-MSCs for 30 minutes, three patients in each cluster, with an increment of cell numbers when there was no dose-limited adverse event. Clinical and safety assessments were performed during the study period, and serum cytokines were measured at baseline and 24 hours after the infusion. Out of 11 screened RA patients, 9 were enrolled. The participants were predominantly female (78%) and the mean age was 57.4 years. The mean disease duration was 9.5 years, and baseline 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28; using erythrocyte sedimentation rate) was 4.53. There was no major toxicity in all clusters up to 4 weeks after the infusion. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate changes at 4 weeks (n = 9) were -7.9 +/- 10.4 (p = .0517) and DAS28 changes were -1.60 +/- 1.57 (p = .0159). Reduced levels of IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-alpha at 24 hours were observed in the cluster infused with 1 x 10(8) MSCs. This phase la hUCB-MSC infusion trial for established RA patients revealed no short-term safety concerns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available