4.6 Article

Recellularization of Acellular Human Small Intestine Using Bone Marrow Stem Cells

Journal

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 307-315

Publisher

ALPHAMED PRESS
DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0108

Keywords

Adult human bone marrow; Adult stem cells; Transdifferentiation; Differentiation

Funding

  1. Swedish Government LUA ALF grants
  2. Lars Erik Gelins Foundation
  3. Inga-Britt and Arne Lundbergs Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We aimed to produce an acellular human tissue scaffold with a view to test the possibility of recellularization with bone marrow stem cells to produce a tissue-engineered small intestine (TESI). Human small-bowel specimens (n = 5) were obtained from cadaveric organ donors and treated sequentially with 6% dimethyl sulfoxide in hypotonic buffer, 1% Triton X-100, and DNase. Each small intestine (SI) piece (6 cm) was recellularized with EPCAM+ and CD133+ allogeneic bone marrow stem cells. Histological and molecular analysis demonstrated that after decellularization, all cellular components and nuclear material were removed. Our analysis also showed that the decellularized human SI tissue retained its histoarchitecture with intact villi and major structural proteins. Protein films of common extracellular matrix constituents (collagen I, laminin, and fibronectin) were found in abundance. Furthermore, several residual angiogenic factors were found in the decellularized SI. Following recellularization, we found viable mucin-positive goblet cells, CK18+ epithelial cells in villi adjacent to a muscularis mucosa with alpha-actin+ smooth muscle cells, and a high repopulation of blood vessels with CD31+ endothelial cells. Our results show that in the future, such a TESI would be ideal for clinical purposes, because it can be derived from the recipient's own immunocompatible bone marrow cells, thus avoiding the use of immunosuppression. STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2013;2:307-315

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available