4.7 Review

Assessing Land Degradation and Desertification Using Vegetation Index Data: Current Frameworks and Future Directions

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 9552-9575

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs6109552

Keywords

land degradation; desertification; NDVI; NPP; multi-temporal; trend analysis; RESTREND; RUE; UNCCD

Funding

  1. Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU) Research Fellowship
  2. EU [PCIG12-GA-2012-3374327]
  3. MMU Research Accelerator Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Land degradation and desertification has been ranked as a major environmental and social issue for the coming decades. Thus, the observation and early detection of degradation is a primary objective for a number of scientific and policy organisations, with remote sensing methods being a candidate choice for the development of monitoring systems. This paper reviews the statistical and ecological frameworks of assessing land degradation and desertification using vegetation index data. The development of multi-temporal analysis as a desertification assessment technique is reviewed, with a focus on how current practice has been shaped by controversy and dispute within the literature. The statistical techniques commonly employed are examined from both a statistical as well as ecological point of view, and recommendations are made for future research directions. The scientific requirements for degradation and desertification monitoring systems identified here are: (I) the validation of methodologies in a robust and comparable manner; and (II) the detection of degradation at minor intensities and magnitudes. It is also established that the multi-temporal analysis of vegetation index data can provide a sophisticated measure of ecosystem health and variation, and that, over the last 30 years, considerable progress has been made in the respective research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available