4.7 Article

Remote Estimation of Chlorophyll-a in Inland Waters by a NIR-Red-Based Algorithm: Validation in Asian Lakes

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 3492-3510

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs6043492

Keywords

chlorophyll-a concentration; NIR-red algorithms; blue-green algorithms; Asian lakes; accuracy assessment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41201423]
  2. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2012ZX07105-004]
  3. MEXT from Japan [25420555, 23404015]
  4. Ministry of the Environment, Japan [S-9-4-(1)]
  5. JSPS RONPAKU (Dissertation PhD) Program
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25420555, 23404015] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Satellite remote sensing is a highly useful tool for monitoring chlorophyll-a concentration (Chl-a) in water bodies. Remote sensing algorithms based on near-infrared-red (NIR-red) wavelengths have demonstrated great potential for retrieving Chl-a in inland waters. This study tested the performance of a recently developed NIR-red based algorithm, SAMO-LUT (Semi-Analytical Model Optimizing and Look-Up Tables), using an extensive dataset collected from five Asian lakes. Results demonstrated that Chl-a retrieved by the SAMO-LUT algorithm was strongly correlated with measured Chl-a (R-2 = 0.94), and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and normalized root-mean-square error (NRMS) were 8.9 mg center dot m(-3) and 72.6%, respectively. However, the SAMO-LUT algorithm yielded large errors for sites where Chl-a was less than 10 mg center dot m(-3) (RMSE = 1.8 mg center dot m(-3) and NRMS = 217.9%). This was because differences in water-leaving radiances at the NIR-red wavelengths (i.e., 665 nm, 705 nm and 754 nm) used in the SAMO-LUT were too small due to low concentrations of water constituents. Using a blue-green algorithm (OC4E) instead of the SAMO-LUT for the waters with low constituent concentrations would have reduced the RMSE and NRMS to 1.0 mg center dot m(-3) and 16.0%, respectively. This indicates (1) the NIR-red algorithm does not work well when water constituent concentrations are relatively low; (2) different algorithms should be used in light of water constituent concentration; and thus (3) it is necessary to develop a classification method for selecting the appropriate algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available