4.7 Article

An Improved Image Fusion Approach Based on Enhanced Spatial and Temporal the Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages 6346-6360

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs5126346

Keywords

image fusion; reflectance; Landsat; MODIS

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System (LREIS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [O88RA900PA]
  2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR), CAS [2012ZD010]
  3. National Science Foundation of China
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program Climate Change: Carbon Budget and Related Issues of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA05040403]
  5. Global Change Program of the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2010CB950704, 2010CB950902, 2010CB950904]
  6. One Hundred Talents program
  7. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  8. [41071059]
  9. [41271116]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High spatiotemporal resolution satellite imagery is useful for natural resource management and monitoring for land-use and land-cover change and ecosystem dynamics. However, acquisitions from a single satellite can be limited, due to trade-offs in either spatial or temporal resolution. The spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model (STARFM) and the enhanced STARFM (ESTARFM) were developed to produce new images with high spatial and high temporal resolution using images from multiple sources. Nonetheless, there were some shortcomings in these models, especially for the procedure of searching spectrally similar neighbor pixels in the models. In order to improve these models' capacity and accuracy, we developed a modified version of ESTARFM (mESTARFM) and tested the performance of two approaches (ESTARFM and mESTARFM) in three study areas located in Canada and China at different time intervals. The results show that mESTARFM improved the accuracy of the simulated reflectance at fine resolution to some extent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available