4.7 Article

Distinct evolution process among type I interferon in mammals

Journal

PROTEIN & CELL
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 383-392

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13238-013-3021-1

Keywords

type I IFN; evolutionary history; vertebrate; gene cluster

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31100644]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology program of China [2011AA10A215, 2010GB24910698]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China Innovative Research Group [81021003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interferon (IFN) is thought to play an important role in the vertebrate immune system, but systemic knowledge of IFN evolution has yet to be elucidated. To evaluate the phylogenic distribution and evolutionary history of type I IFNs, 13genomes were searched using BLASTn program, and a phylogenetic tree of vertebrate type I IFNs was constructed. In the present study, an IFN delta-like gene in the human genome was identified, refuting the concept that humans have no IFN delta genes, and other mammalian IFN genes were also identified. In the phylogenetic tree, the mammalian IFN beta, IFNE >, and IFN kappa formed a clade separate from the other mammalian type I IFNs, while piscine and avian IFNs formed distinct clades. Based on this phylogenetic analysis and the various characteristics of type I IFNs, the evolutionary history of type I IFNs was further evaluated. Our data indicate that an ancestral IFN alpha-like gene forms a core from which new IFNs divided during vertebrate evolution. In addition, the data suggest how the other type I IFNs evolved from IFN alpha and shaped the complex type I IFN system. The promoters of type I IFNs were conserved among different mammals, as well as their genic regions. However, the intergenic regions of type I IFN clusters were not conserved among different mammals, demonstrating a high selection pressure upon type I IFNs during their evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available