3.9 Review

Herbal interventions for chronic asthma in adults and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 307-314

Publisher

PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY SOC-PCRS UK
DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2010.00041

Keywords

asthma; herbal; complementary; systematic review; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. St George's, University of London UK
  2. Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry/Plymouth teaching PCT UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To assess the efficacy of herb and plant extracts in the management of asthma. Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Multiple database searches identified randomised placebo controlled trials of herbal interventions reporting at least one primary outcome measure. Where possible data were combined for meta-analysis. Primary outcome measures were lung function, exacerbations and reduction in corticosteroid use. Secondary outcome measures were symptoms and symptom scores, use of reliever medications, changes in rates of consultation and adverse effects. Results: Twenty-six studies reporting on 20 herbal preparations were included. Two of six studies reporting change in FEV1 were positive. Little data was available on frequency of exacerbations. For primary outcomes single studies of Boswellia, Mai-Men-Dong-Tang, Pycnogenol, Jia-Wei-Si-Jun-Zi-Tang and Tylophora indica showed potential to improve lung function, and a study of 1.8-Cineol (eucalyptol) showed reduced daily oral steroid dosage. Conclusions: Improvements in symptoms were not strongly supported by objective changes. Most trials were of small sample size, short duration, and poor methodology. Further adequately powered trials are needed to assess these compounds. Such trials should conform to CONSORT guidance, report standardised spirometry, and use validated symptom and severity scores. No recommendations for herbal treatment of asthma can be made from the current evidence. (c) 2010 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK. All rights reserved. C Clark et al. Prim Care Resp J 2010; 19(4): 307-314 doi:10.4104/pcrj.2010.00041

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available