4.2 Article

Supporting diabetes self-management in primary care: Pilot-study of a group-based programme focusing on diet and exercise

Journal

PRIMARY CARE DIABETES
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 103-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.02.001

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes; Self-management; Group education; Primary care; Empowerment; Goal setting

Funding

  1. Belgian Government (National Health Insurance Institute)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To develop and implement a group self-management education programme for people with type 2 diabetes at the community level in primary care. This pilot-study intended to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and long-term effects (12-18 months) of this programme on emotional distress, HbA1c, BMI and actual behaviour. Methods: An empowerment-based, theory-driven education programme was evaluated in a before-after design. The programme focused on behaviour assessment, goal-setting, problem solving and tailored information. A diabetes specialist nurse conjointly with a dietician or psychologist led five 2-hour sessions and a follow-up meeting after 3 months. Results: Forty-four people participated in 5 groups. BMI decreased with 0.45 kg/m(2) (95%CI 0.01-0.89) at 12-month and with 0.53 kg/m(2) (95%CI 0.02-1.04) at 18-month follow-up. HbA1c declined from 7.4% (+1.3) to 6.8% (+0.8) (p = 0.040) and the PAID-score diminished from 28 (+20) to 18 (+13) (p =0.006) at 12-month post-intervention. These changes were only partly sustained at 18-month follow-up. Actual behaviour changed modestly. Conclusion: Introducing the group education programme in primary healthcare is worthwhile (feasibility and effectiveness). A detailed description of the intervention is offered. Further research should explore the actual education process in greater depth. (C) 2009 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available