4.7 Article

Biosourced Binder for Wood Particleboards Based on Spent Sulfite Liquor and Wheat Flour

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym10101070

Keywords

bioadhesives; wood composites; spent sulfite liquor; wheat flour

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (COMPETE2020-Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao (POCI))
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT)
  3. project LEPABE-2-ECO-INNOVATION [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000005]
  4. Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020) under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement through the ERDF
  5. [POCI-01-0247-FEDER-003489]
  6. [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006939]
  7. [UID/EQU/00511/2013]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/EQU/00511/2013] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, the majority of binders used in wood particleboard (PB) manufacturing are formaldehyde-based synthetic resins. Because of the toxicity of formaldehyde, there is a strong demand for eco-friendly alternatives with similar performances and economic viability. In this work, thick spent sulfite liquor (TSSL), an industrial byproduct from sulfite pulp mills, is proposed as a binder for fully bio-based PBs. The results showed that PBs bound with TSSL present appropriate mechanical performance, which was further improved when TSSL was combined with wheat flour at an 84:16 dry weight ratio and preheated to 94 degrees C prior to application. For 13.2% binder content per dry wood weight, the PB internal bond strength was 0.46 N mm(-2), which is above the standard requirements for PB type P2 (0.35 N mm(-2)). Optical microscopy showed that TSSL hinders the gelatinization of starch granules during preheating, allowing the binder mixture to maintain a low viscosity suitable for combination with wood particles and PB production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available