4.7 Article

An Experimental Study on the Shear Behaviors of Polymer-Sand Composite Materials after Immersion

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym10080924

Keywords

polymers; sand; composite materials; shear behavior; immersion

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41472241]
  2. Water Conservancy Science and Technology Project of Jiangsu Province, China [2017010]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016B05914]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sand mixed with geotextile/fiber/cement/lime or non-traditional chemical additives to form composite materials is recognized as an effective method for improving the sand properties. In this work, the variation in properties of composite materials after immersion is reported which has rarely appeared in the literature. The focus of this study is to evaluate the shear behaviors of polymer-sand composite material after immersion with direct shear tests. Several factors which may influence the shear behaviors after immersion are analyzed. The results demonstrate that this composite material still has good shear behaviors after immersion when compared to the purely sand material. The shear behaviors are improved with an increment in the curing time, polymer content and sand dry density while there is a decrease in the shear behaviors with increasing immersion time. The interaction between sand particles and the polymer are analyzed with Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The polymer membranes are formed by polymer enwrapping and connected sand particles to build an elastic and viscous structure in the sand that increases the interlocking forces between sand particles and decreases the void ratio of this material. The membranes are softened in water resulting in a decrease in the shear strength. Moreover, other factors affect the shear behaviors by improving the completeness and stability of this structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available