4.7 Article

HIV-1 Nef targets MHC-I and CD4 for degradation via a final common β-COP-dependent pathway in T cells

Journal

PLOS PATHOGENS
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000131

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1 AI46998]
  2. University of Michigan Cellular and Molecular Biology Training Program
  3. University of Michigan Research Training in Experimental Immunology Training Grant
  4. Herman and Dorothy Miller Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To facilitate viral infection and spread, HIV-1 Nef disrupts the surface expression of the viral receptor (CD4) and molecules capable of presenting HIV antigens to the immune system (MHC-I). To accomplish this, Nef binds to the cytoplasmic tails of both molecules and then, by mechanisms that are not well understood, disrupts the trafficking of each molecule in different ways. Specifically, Nef promotes CD4 internalization after it has been transported to the cell surface, whereas Nef uses the clathrin adaptor, AP-1, to disrupt normal transport of MHC-I from the TGN to the cell surface. Despite these differences in initial intracellular trafficking, we demonstrate that MHC-I and CD4 are ultimately found in the same Rab7(+) vesicles and are both targeted for degradation via the activity of the Nef-interacting protein, beta-COP. Moreover, we demonstrate that Nef contains two separable beta-COP binding sites. One site, an arginine (RXR) motif in the N-terminal a helical domain of Nef, is necessary for maximal MHC-I degradation. The second site, composed of a di-acidic motif located in the C-terminal loop domain of Nef, is needed for efficient CD4 degradation. The requirement for redundant motifs with distinct roles supports a model in which Nef exists in multiple conformational states that allow access to different motifs, depending upon which cellular target is bound by Nef.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available