4.5 Article

Comparing the effectiveness of different strains of Wolbachia for controlling chikungunya, dengue fever, and zika

Journal

PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006666

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11501145]
  2. Fundamental Research funds for the Central Universities of China [HEUCFM181101]
  3. endowment for the Evelyn and John G. Phillips Distinguished Chair in Mathematics at Tulane University
  4. National Science Foundation [MPS-DMS-1122666, MPS-DMS-156353]
  5. NIH/NIGMS [U01GM097661]
  6. DEB-RAPID [1641130]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Once Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes that spread Chikungunya virus, dengue virus, and Zika virus are infected with Wolbachia, they have reduced egg laying rates, reduced transmission abilities, and shorter lifespans. Since most infected mosquitoes are only infectious in the last few days of their lives, shortening a mosquito's lifespan by a day or two can greatly reduce their abilities to spread mosquito-borne viral diseases, such as Chikungunya, dengue fever, and Zika. We developed a mathematical model to compare the effectiveness of the wMel and wAlbB strains of Wolbachia for controlling the spread of these viruses. The differences among the diseases, mosquitoes, and Wolbachia strains are captured by the model parameters for the mosquito-human transmission cycle. Moreover, the model accounts for the behavior changes of infectious population created by differences in the malaise caused by these viruses. We derived the effective and basic reproduction numbers for the model that are used to estimate the number of secondary infections from the infectious populations. In the same density of Wolbachia-free Aedes aegypti or Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, we observed that wMel and wAlbB strains of Wolbachia can reduce the transmission rates of these diseases effectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available