4.5 Article

New Approaches with Different Types of Circulating Cathodic Antigen for the Diagnosis of Patients with Low Schistosoma mansoni Load

Journal

PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002054

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)
  2. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz)-Rene Rachou Research Center (CPqRR)
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Education Personnel (Capes)
  4. Council of the International Educational Exchange of Scholars (Fulbright, U.S. Department of State)
  5. NIH [AI156484, AI068109]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Schistosomiasis mansoni is a debilitating and sometimes fatal disease. Accurate diagnosis plays a key role in patient management and infection control. However, currently available parasitological methods are laborious and lack sensitivity. The selection of target antigen candidates has turned out to be a promising tool for the development of more sensitive diagnostic methods. In our previous investigations, the use of crude antigens led to false-positive results. Recently, focus has been given to highly purified Schistosoma mansoni antigens, especially to circulating antigens. Method: Thus, our main goal was to test different types of circulating cathodic antigen glycoprotein (CCA), as crude antigen, the protein chain of recombinant CCA and two individual peptides. These schistosome proteins/peptides were tested in a new diagnostic method employing immunomagnetic separation based on the improvement of antigen-antibody binding. Principal Findings: Use of recombinant CCA as a diagnostic antigen allowed us to develop a diagnostic assay with high sensitivity and specificity with no false-negative results. Interestingly, the crude antigen worked as a good marker for control of cure after praziquantel treatment. Conclusions/Significance: Our new diagnostic method was superior to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in diagnosing low endemicity patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available