4.6 Editorial Material

In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter?

Journal

PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 3-5

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050004

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background to the debate: Systematic reviews that combine high-quality evidence from several trials are now widely considered to be at the top of the hierarchy of clinical evidence. Given the primacy of systematic reviews and the fact that individual clinical trials rarely provide definitive answers to a clinical research question - some commentators question whether the sample size calculation for an individual trial still matters. Others point out that small trials can still be potentially misleading.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available