4.6 Article

Testicular Differentiation Occurs in Absence of R-spondin1 and Sox9 in Mouse Sex Reversals

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003170

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-10-BLAN-1239-molmechmeiosis, ANR-09-GENM-009-03 GENIDOV]
  2. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer [SFI20101201408]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In mammals, male sex determination is governed by SRY-dependent activation of Sox9, whereas female development involves R-spondin1 (RSPO1), an activator of the WNT/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Genetic analyses in mice have demonstrated Sry and Sox9 to be both required and sufficient to induce testicular development. These genes are therefore considered as master regulators of the male pathway. Indeed, female-to-male sex reversal in XX Rspo1 mutant mice correlates with Sox9 expression, suggesting that this transcription factor induces testicular differentiation in pathological conditions. Unexpectedly, here we show that testicular differentiation can occur in XX mutants lacking both Rspo1 and Sox9 (referred to as XX Rspo1(KO) Sox9(cKO)), indicating that Sry and Sox9 are dispensable to induce female-to-male sex reversal. Molecular analyses show expression of both Sox8 and Sox10, suggesting that activation of Sox genes other than Sox9 can induce male differentiation in Rspo1(KO) Sox9(cKO) mice. Moreover, since testis development occurs in XY Rspo1(KO) Sox9(cKO) mice, our data show that Rspo1 is the main effector for male-to-female sex reversal in XY Sox9(cKO) mice. Thus, Rspo1 is an essential activator of ovarian development not only in normal situations, but also in sex reversal situations. Taken together these data demonstrate that both male and female sex differentiation is induced by distinct, active, genetic pathways. The dogma that considers female differentiation as a default pathway therefore needs to be definitively revised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available