4.6 Article

Towards Establishment of a Rice Stress Response Interactome

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [GM59962]
  2. USDA [2008-01048, 2004-63560416640]
  3. UC Discovery Program
  4. Korea government (MEST) [2010-0017649]
  5. Crop Functional Genomics Center (CFGC) [CG2111-2]
  6. Korean Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [R33-2008-000-10168-0]
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0981]
  8. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [R33-2008-000-10168-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rice (Oryza sativa) is a staple food for more than half the world and a model for studies of monocotyledonous species, which include cereal crops and candidate bioenergy grasses. A major limitation of crop production is imposed by a suite of abiotic and biotic stresses resulting in 30%-60% yield losses globally each year. To elucidate stress response signaling networks, we constructed an interactome of 100 proteins by yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays around key regulators of the rice biotic and abiotic stress responses. We validated the interactome using protein-protein interaction (PPI) assays, co-expression of transcripts, and phenotypic analyses. Using this interactome-guided prediction and phenotype validation, we identified ten novel regulators of stress tolerance, including two from protein classes not previously known to function in stress responses. Several lines of evidence support cross-talk between biotic and abiotic stress responses. The combination of focused interactome and systems analyses described here represents significant progress toward elucidating the molecular basis of traits of agronomic importance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available